Below are sample
test items from the prototype assessment for Geometry.
Sample
selected response items:
Directions:
An artist will reflect triangle ABC across the dotted line on the
computer screen shown below.

 |
|
What
will be the coordinates of the image of vertex A?
-
(25,72)
-
(35,72)
-
(85,72)
-
(95,72)
|
| |
|
| |
Answer:
c |
| |
|
| |
|
Mathematics
Goal, Expectation, Learning Indicator: |
| |
|
2.1.3 The student
will use transformations to move figures, create designs,
and/or demonstrate geometric properties. |
| |
|
|
| |
Instructional
Implications: |
| |
The
Geometry assessment for the State will emphasize students'
ability to solve mathematical and real-world problems
using measurement and geometric models. Students should
receive ongoing instruction and encouragement related to
justifying solutions and explaining processes used.
Instruction should assist them to understand key concepts
in mathematics such as coordinate points and the skill of
manipulating geometric shapes according to pre-determined
coordinates. Once again, instruction should continually
reinforce the application of mathematical concepts,
principles, and algorithms to the world beyond the
classroom. |
Directions:
Both rectangular solids shown below have the same volume.

 |
|
What is
the value of x?
-
4
-
8
-
12
-
16
|
| |
|
| |
Answer:
b |
| |
|
| |
|
Mathematics
Goal, Expectation, Learning Indicator: |
| |
|
2.3.2 The student
will use techniques of measurement and will estimate,
calculate, and/or compare perimeter, circumference, area,
volume and/or
surface area of two and three dimensional figures and
their parts. The
results will be expressed with appropriate precision. |
| |
|
|
| |
Instructional
Implications: |
| |
Students
need ongoing instruction to enable them to apply geometric
equations to solve for volume, perimeter, area, and
related measurements. They should also be able to examine
pictorial representations, models, and graphic structures
to solve geometric equations. Additionally, students
should have extensive experience in solving word problems
or other real-life scenarios involving geometric equations
and their application. As is true in all areas of
mathematics instruction, students need ongoing experiences
in justifying and providing evidence to support their
problem-solving approach(es). |
Sample
extended constructed response item:
Time limit - 10 minutes
Directions:
A person is stacking six cylindrical pipes as shown below. Each pipe
is 30 inches in diameter. Look at the drawing and answer the question
that follows.

 |
|
What is
the height (h) of the stack of pipes?
Explain
how you determined the height of the stack. Use words,
symbols, and/or diagrams in your explanation.
Justify
your answer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
Solution: |
| |
|
Approximately 82
inches..
For an extended
constructed response, the student will be graded in a
rubric
scale of 0-4. The criteria includes:
- Analysis - Did
the student show understanding of the problem?
- Representation -
Did the student appropriately display and
identify information?
- Application - Did
the student use appropriate concepts and
strategies to solve the problem?
- Explanation - Did
the student use words and/or symbols to
explain the process used to solve the problem?
- Justification -
Did the student use definitions, postulates,
theorems of mathematics to verify the solution to
the problem?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Scoring
Rubric: |
| |
|
- A score of 4
indicates application of a reasonable strategy that
leads to a correct solution in the context of the
problem. The
representations are correct. The explanation and/or
justification are
logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed,
support the
solution, and do not contain significant mathematical
errors. The
response demonstrates a complete understanding and
analysis
of the problem.
- A score of 3
indicates application of a reasonable strategy that
may or may not lead to a correct solution. The
representations
are essentially correct. The explanation and/or
justification
are generally well developed, feasible, and support
the solution.
The response demonstrates a clear understanding and
analysis
of the problem.
- A score of 2
indicates incomplete application of a reasonable
strategy that may or may not lead to a correct
solution.
The representations are fundamentally correct. The
explanation
and/or justification may not be well developed, are
plausible,
and/or may be incomplete. The response demonstrates a
conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem.
- A score of 1
indicates little or no attempt to apply a reasonable
strategy that may be incomplete or underdeveloped. It
may or
may not have the correct answer. The representations
are
partially correct. The explanation and/or
justification reveal
serious flaws in reasoning. The response demonstrates
a minimal
understanding and analysis of the problem.
- A score of 0
indicates the work is completely incorrect or
irrelevant. There may be no response or the response
may
state "I don't know."
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Mathematics
Goal, Expectation, Learning Indicator: |
| |
|
1.2.3 The student
will solve and describe if and where two straight lines
intersect using numbers, symbols, and/or graphs.
1.2.5 The student will apply formulas and/or use
matrices(arrays of
numbers) to solve real-world problems. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Instructional
Implications: |
| |
The
experience of preparing students for the Maryland School
Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP) confirms the
critical value of students' having direct and ongoing
experience in defending and supporting conclusions with
concrete evidence. Real-life applications and problem
solving should be a fundamental and ongoing part of
students' experience in their mathematics classrooms.
Additionally, as this question emphasizes, students need
to master the operational language of Algebra, Geometry,
and Probability/Statistics, including accurate and
elaborated use of words, symbols, and diagrams associated
with the explanation of solutions to mathematical
problems. To ensure that all students acquire and
integrate these skills, students should have extended
opportunities for timed and untimed writing activities in
their mathematics classrooms. Teachers must become
familiar with the scoring rubric used and practice using
the rubric when grading teacher-designed classroom-based
tests. |
Back
to Assessment Design Page
Back
to High School Assessment Initiative Page
|