The performance
assessment tasks that students encounter on MSPAP are designed to
present meaningful and authentic (i.e., real-world) activities requiring
the application of identified learner outcomes in a variety of settings
and situations. Student responses can be scored for more than one
content area. For example, students might be asked to compare Jack
London's short story, “To Build a Fire” and a Scientific American
article on “Hypothermia.” In a series of performance-based
activities, students might identify key concepts and themes, describe
the scientific accuracy of London's story, and complete an extended
essay comparing the fiction and non-fiction accounts.
In constructing a
performance task similar to those encountered by students on MSPAP,
teachers might consider the following guiding questions:
-
Are
the tasks worth mastering?
-
Are
the tasks presented within a meaningful context?
-
Do
the tasks require an integrated performance?
-
Are
the tasks valid and reflective of identified outcomes?
Do the tasks require
students' application of a variety of higher-order thinking skills in
response to activities requiring:
-
A
path of action allowing for alternatives and choices?
-
Intellectual
complexity and self-regulated thinking?
-
Multiple
solutions to problems and decisions?
-
Ongoing
judgments and interpretations?
-
The
integration of multiple content domains and outcomes?