| How
are Performance Assessment Tasks Scored?
According to the
Maryland School Performance Assessment Program, students'
responses to performance assessment tasks are considered
“open-ended”, that is, students generate their own
responses. In almost all instances, a wide range of responses
to tasks is acceptable. The amount of credit awarded to a
response depends upon the outcomes being measured by that
particular activity. One of three kinds of scoring tools can
be used to assign scores to student responses to performance
assessment tasks:
|
|
- Rubrics:
A score scale (the number of points that can be given)
and a description of response characteristics for each
score point. A scoring rubric is generic -- that is, the
scale and descriptors do not change to fit a particular
activity.
- Rule:
A narrower score scale with fewer score points and a
brief description of the response characteristics for
each score point. A rule is a bit like a condensed
rubric. Like a rubric, a rule does not change to fit a
particular activity.
- Scoring
Key: An
activity-specific score point scale and descriptions of
the response characteristics at each score point. A
scoring key is designed specifically for a particular
activity.
|
|
|
Sample Scoring
Rubric: Writing to Persuade
|
|
| 3
Points |
|
- Development: The
writer identifies a clear position and fully supports or
refutes that position with relevant personal and/or
factual information.
- Organization:
The writer
presents an organizational plan that is logical and
consistently maintained.
- Attention
to Audience: The
writer effectively addresses the needs and characteristics
of the identified audience.
- Language:
The writer
consistently uses language choices to enhance the text.
|
|
| 2
Points |
|
- Development: The
writer identifies a clear position and fully supports or
refutes that position with relevant personal and/or
factual information.
- Organization:
The writer
presents an organizational plan that is logical and
maintained, but with minor flaws.
- Attention
to Audience: The
writer adequately addresses the needs and characteristics
of the identified audience.
- Language:
The writer
frequently uses language choices to enhance the text.
|
|
| 1
Point |
|
- Development: The
writer identifies a position, yet that position lacks
clarity. The writer tries to support or refute that
position with relevant personal and/or factual
information.
- Organization:
The writer
presents an organizational plan that is only generally
maintained.
- Attention
to Audience: The
writer minimally addresses the needs and characteristics
of the identified audience.
- Language:
The writer
sometimes uses language choices to enhance the text.
|
|
| 0
Points |
|
- Development: The
writer identifies an ambiguous position with little or no
relevant personal and/or factual information to support
that position; or, the writer fails to identify a
position.
- Organization:
The writer
presents an argument that is illogical and/or minimally
maintained.
- Attention
to Audience: The
writer effectively addresses the needs and characteristics
of the identified audience.
- Language:
The writer
seldom, if ever, uses language choices to enhance the
text.
|
|
| |
|
|
Sample Language
in Use Rule
|
|
| 2
Points |
|
- Consistently uses
word and sentence order and language choices to express
meaning with style and tone. Text conveys uniform
impression of correctness* and errors that are present
represent risk-taking.
|
|
| 1
Point |
|
- Sometimes uses word
and sentence order and language choices to express meaning
with style and tone. Text generally conveys impression of
correctness* and errors may or may not represent
risk-taking.
|
|
| 0
Points |
|
- Rarely or never uses
word and sentence order and language choices to express
meaning with style and tone. Text appears error-ridden.
|
|
* correct usage,
punctuation, spelling, and capitalization
|
|
|
Sample Scoring
Key
|
|
The following activities were part of a fifth-grade MSPAP
mathematics task, which involved planning seating arrangements
for a special luncheon.
|
|
There will be 19
guests plus the principal at the luncheon. There are a total
of 36 small square tables you may use. Each small square
table seats one person on a side. You do not have to use all
of the small tables. On the graph paper draw all possible
rectangular arrangements that can be made to seat exactly 20
people.
(Note: Graph paper
included in student response book.)
|
|
| Scoring
Tool |
|
The response
demonstrates the use of problem solving approaches to
investigate geometric shapes, patterns and functions.
|
|
| 2
Points |
|
- All 5 patterns are
correctly drawn on graph paper.
|
|
| 1
Point |
|
- 3-4 patterns are
correctly drawn on graph paper.
|
|
| 0
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
Answer Cue
|