 |
Understanding
MSPAP
All members of the school staff must be able to modify their
approach to curriculum, instruction, and assessment based upon
an understanding of MSPAP, including ongoing attention to
using performance-based instructional and assessment tasks,
training students to meet testing requirements, and
incorporating related instructional changes. |
| |
|
 |
Teaching
Thinking
Many successful schools
emphasize teaching students key cognitive skills within and
across grade levels. Many staffs emphasized the eight thinking
skills articulated in the Dimensions of Learning program:
comparison, classification, induction, deduction, analysis of
errors, abstracting/pattern recognition, analysis of
perspectives, and constructing support. |
| |
|
 |
Inviting
Learning
Schools demonstrating
consistent MSPAP success appeared to emphasize the
reinforcement of a positive school culture and atmosphere for
learning; most sites used cooperative learning and conflict
resolution techniques. There is also an emerging need to
accommodate the unique needs and strengths of Special
Education and ESOL students. |
| |
|
 |
Setting
Targets
Successful schools used a
clear core curriculum consistent with both MSPAP
outcomes and PGCPS Scope and Sequence expectancies and
indicators; a great deal of emphasis was placed upon
integrated and interdisciplinary instruction designed to help
students make connections across discipline areas and to apply
what they were learning in real-world ways and contexts. |
| |
|
 |
Supporting
Communication
Essential communication skills
were an ongoing part of all disciplines in schools
experiencing MSPAP success. Additionally, intra- and
inter-site communication was a clear and significant
commitment in successful sites. Open exchanges of ideas were
evident. These schools were in the process of becoming genuine
learning organizations. |
| |
|
 |
Reading
and Writing for All
All teachers in successful
MSPAP school sites modeled reading and writing strategies and
processes. In effect, critical and analytical reading was a
fundamental part of all teachers' repertoires, not just
reading and English instructors. There was also evidence of
teachers' tailoring the writing process to the unique needs
and parameters of their disciplines. |
| |
|
 |
Planning
Together
Successful MSPAP sites
demonstrate the power of group planning and collaborative
decision making. All facets of MSPAP preparation appeared to
involve the active and ongoing use of study groups, action
research processes, and peer coaching experiences. MSPAP was
also a fundamental and recurrent emphasis in successful school
improvement plans. |
| |
|
 |
Testing
Effectiveness
Effective MSPAP sites had
a productive test preparation program. Strategic decisions
guided short- and long-range instructional practices,
including active use of quarterly performance-based
instructional and assessment tasks consistent with core
curriculum expectancies and indicators. Practice for MSPAP-like
assessments was an organic part of overall instruction. |
| |
|
 |
Encouraging
Involvement
Parents and community are
especially important for MSPAP success. In a majority of
successful sites, there was frequent and ongoing presence of
parent outreach, training, and involvement, including clear
commitment to ensuring that parents and community members
understand both MSPAP task design and the instructional
implications of the program. |
| |
|
 |
Working
Together
Successful MSPAP sites
promoted ongoing collaboration with central office personnel
and other schools within their feeder pattern, making full use
of available resources rather than functioning as “islands
unto themselves.” A major conclusion was that MSPAP
preparation is "everyone's job," not just teachers
in the 3rd, 5th, and 8th grades. |